4 thoughts on “Is the so -called Zhengshi really facts? The history books are written by the so -called literati. Will they really record it truthfully?”
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Generally speaking, history is written by literati intellectuals such as historians and doctors. As long as it exists as a human concept, it is inevitable that there will be subjective initiative, and there will be a stance of praise and derogation. It can be said that most historians and doctors of the Royal History will record truthfully, and a small part of the judgment of selfishly.
This Sima Qian Sima Qian as a famous historian and writer in the Western Han Dynasty. The masterpiece "Historical Records" is a model of being recognized by later generations. Mr. Lu Xun once evaluated the "Historical Records" and said: The historians' singing, no rhyme to leave. " Many.
The Emperor Hanwu was originally a famous emperor in Chinese history. It opened the country to expand, resist the Huns, conquer Korean, and set the civil strife. , Petting the harem, private supporting male pets, believers, etc., but friends who have read "Historical Records" will find that in "Xiaowu Benji", Emperor Hanwu's skills have not been mentioned. The record of the words of the words of Yongwei. A certain year, a month of patrol in Taishan to seal the order, a certain year got a strange treasure to celebrate the celebration of Xiangrui.
The emperor who is in Qianqiu is a day -to -day sacrifice.
Tong Tai Shigong said: Yu Cong Xian Xian Xun Tian and Earth's gods and mountains and rivers and seal Zen. So retreat. Since ancient times, those who have used things in ghosts and gods have seen their tables. Afterwards, gentlemen can be viewed. If the details of the cowpea Gui coin, the gift of paid, there will be a mixing. 》 After each article, there will be an evaluation of Tai Shigong to summarize the life and conclude that the evaluation of Emperor Sima to Emperor Hanwu is "like weird power." And very obvious.
The Chu Suiliang Tang Dynasty, who is not afraid of beheading, is a famous open and prosperous dynasty, and the Ming Junxian is a model. There have also been interesting stories of the emperor and historians.
In words, Tang Taizong successively inherited the relatives Li Jiancheng and his son, and the three younger brother Li Yuanji in the early years. After that, Emperor Taizong had nothing to do with it. Whenever he thought of this, he couldn't help but feel ashamed in his heart.
So one day, he joked with the historian Chu Suiliang: Chu Aiqing was a historian, whether he had to take every piece of every piece. Everything is recorded in the case, and whether the shameful things are recorded.
Chu Suiliang said, all records, this is the duty of the minister. Don't remember, people in the world will remember "
, so Tang Taizong dispel the idea of tampering with history.
This shows that all history is fake, nor all history is all history. Really. It is precisely because it is difficult to distinguish between true and false and false and false. It makes history interesting. Whether history is true and reliable, depending on the nature of the person who records history at the time.
Because many positive history spans are relatively large, and those who write history books will also bring personal emotions, so there is still a certain difference from the real facts. Some of them will still be recorded truthfully. Some may be exaggerated. This needs to be distinguished by itself.
The so -called positive history is not necessarily true. They sometimes do not record truthfully, and they add fuel and vinegar.
Historical records have wild history and Zhengshi. If even the history is not believed, how should our future generations know the historical events before? The record of historians is very strict, leaving records for future generations.